Avoiding abbreviations

People are lazy. Make it as easy as possible for them to see what you are trying to show. “Mental noise” is my name for ‘work’ your audience has to do before they can actually see what they want to see. In a graph, it can be taking out a ruler to measure a distance, but also tilting the page to read non-horizontal text, or having to look up jargon.

There are tons of ways to reduce mental noise in your charts, but one of the easiest is avoiding abbreviations. Of course, space constraints, general usage, and the specific nature of the abbreviation don’t always make this possible (I wouldn’t replace DNA by deoxyribonucleic acid everywhere), but a specific case where I tend to avoid abbrevations at all costs are countries.

Yes, countries do have official abbreviations — standardized by the ISO 3166 guidelines. There are even 2-letter ánd 3-letter abbrevations for each country. For example, Belgium’s alpha-2 code is BE, and its alpha-3 code is BEL. In most official documents, such as reports by the European Union, the alpha-2 codes are most commonly used. Lack of space is often the main reason, in charts where 27 countries need to be shown.

Bar chart titled 'Number of inhabitants per paid political mandate,' ranking EU27 countries from lowest to highest ratio, labeled with ISO alpha-2 country codes (e.g., FR for France, DK for Denmark). France has the lowest ratio at 134 inhabitants per mandate; Latvia (LV) has the highest at 2,570. The EU27 average of 385, shown in dark blue, falls between Portugal (304) and Romania (415). Source: European Committee of the Regions and VRT NWS.

But these alpha-2 abbrevations are not always as straightforward as in the case of Belgium. Most people will recognize FR, NL or IT. If you know your languages, DE or ES will also make sense. And with some effort, we can decypher SK or AT, even though they don’t always make sense. Some of the lesser known ones are probably EE (Estonia – local name Eesti), HR (Croatia – local name Hrvatska) or EL (Greece – local name Elláda or Ελλάδα).

If you’re looking at 27 EU countries in a list of graph, that’s quite a lot of cognitive load to untangle and recall all of them. Your audience needs quite some background knowledge in order to fully understand your chart. Some people might not even bother looking up country codes they don’t recognize, which of course lowers the relevance of our entire graph. For this reason, I will almost always avoid country abbreviations, and write their names in full. That doesn’t even have to take up much more space:

The same bar chart as the previous visual, but now labeled with full country names to make the chart easier to read and process.

By avoiding these abbreviations, we ensure that readers don’t have to look up anything. They can stay engaged with the chart and get to the point much more quickly. And that’s of course what it’s all about.

Side-by-side comparison of two bar chart versions showing the number of inhabitants per paid political mandate across EU27 countries, ranked from lowest to highest. The left version labels countries with two-letter abbreviations (FR, CZ, SI, etc.), while the right version uses full country names (France, Czechia, Slovenia, etc.). Both show identical data: France has the lowest ratio at 134 inhabitants per mandate, rising through the EU27 average of 385 (highlighted in dark blue), up to Latvia with the highest ratio at 2,570. Source: European Committee of the Regions and VRT NWS.

Source: I encountered a version of this visual on VRT NWS, in an article on the number of political mandates per country (in Dutch). Most of their data was collected from a flash Eurobarometer report “Local politicians of the EU and the future of Europe” by the European Committee of the Regions.

Read more:

Navigating the landscape of powerful charts

Once we’ve decided to create a data visual or infographic, there are a lot of questions we should ask ourselves to determine the most suitable format. These considerations could include size, readability, possible interactive functionality, and the level of detail we need.

Read More

Kenneth Mejia's billboard in the city of Los Angeles, showing a bar chart with a breakdown of the city budget.

How powerful charts can boost your career

An American accountant managed - as the youngest ever! - to win a crucial election in Los Angeles - thanks to the power of data visualization. And you, too, can use powerful charts to boost your career!

Read More

Why is data visualization so challenging?

Data visualization is very powerful, but it can also be hard. That’s because a great data visual combines three different aspects simultaneously: clarity, correctness, and beauty.

Read More

Books on a bookshelf - infographics resources

Data visualization resources: all the links you\’ll ever need!

Your Data Visualization Toolkit: Practical tips, templates, and inspiration to make your data shine. Explore, adapt, and create work that’s clear, compelling, and unforgettable.

Read More

thumbnail for video 01 - why is data visualization so powerful

Why is data visualization so powerful?

The amount of data coming our way is growing exponentially. In 2021 alone, it is estimated that humankind generated 74 zettabytes of data – that’s about 10,000 GB per person. How on earth are we going to keep this manageable?

Read More

Amazing facts about the brain - teaser

Infographic: Amazing facts about the brain

Did you know that our brain makes up 2% of our body weight, but consumers about 20% of our energy? Did you know that we have a second brain, located in our gut?

Our information designer Sofia made this insightful infographic, giving you an overview of eight amazing facts about the brain!

Read More

We are really into visual communication!

Every now and then we send out a newsletter with latest work, handpicked inspirational infographics, must-read blog posts, upcoming dates for workshops and presentations, and links to useful tools and tips. Leave your email address here and we’ll add you to our mailing list of awesome people!