Avoiding abbreviations
Avoiding abbreviations
People are lazy. Make it as easy as possible for them to see what you are trying to show. “Mental noise” is my name for ‘work’ your audience has to do before they can actually see what they want to see. In a graph, it can be taking out a ruler to measure a distance, but also tilting the page to read non-horizontal text, or having to look up jargon.
There are tons of ways to reduce mental noise in your charts, but one of the easiest is avoiding abbreviations. Of course, space constraints, general usage, and the specific nature of the abbreviation don’t always make this possible (I wouldn’t replace DNA by deoxyribonucleic acid everywhere), but a specific case where I tend to avoid abbrevations at all costs are countries.
Yes, countries do have official abbreviations — standardized by the ISO 3166 guidelines. There are even 2-letter ánd 3-letter abbrevations for each country. For example, Belgium’s alpha-2 code is BE, and its alpha-3 code is BEL. In most official documents, such as reports by the European Union, the alpha-2 codes are most commonly used. Lack of space is often the main reason, in charts where 27 countries need to be shown.

But these alpha-2 abbrevations are not always as straightforward as in the case of Belgium. Most people will recognize FR, NL or IT. If you know your languages, DE or ES will also make sense. And with some effort, we can decypher SK or AT, even though they don’t always make sense. Some of the lesser known ones are probably EE (Estonia – local name Eesti), HR (Croatia – local name Hrvatska) or EL (Greece – local name Elláda or Ελλάδα).
If you’re looking at 27 EU countries in a list of graph, that’s quite a lot of cognitive load to untangle and recall all of them. Your audience needs quite some background knowledge in order to fully understand your chart. Some people might not even bother looking up country codes they don’t recognize, which of course lowers the relevance of our entire graph. For this reason, I will almost always avoid country abbreviations, and write their names in full. That doesn’t even have to take up much more space:

By avoiding these abbreviations, we ensure that readers don’t have to look up anything. They can stay engaged with the chart and get to the point much more quickly. And that’s of course what it’s all about.

Source: I encountered a version of this visual on VRT NWS, in an article on the number of political mandates per country (in Dutch). Most of their data was collected from a flash Eurobarometer report “Local politicians of the EU and the future of Europe” by the European Committee of the Regions.
Read more:
Avoiding abbreviations
People are lazy. Make it as easy as possible for them to see what you are trying to show. There are tons of ways to reduce mental noise in your charts, but one of the easiest is avoiding abbreviations.
6 September 2026
The uncomfortable relationship between scientific illustrations and AI
Scientific journal Nature devoted the headline of its 23 July 2026 issue to “the human art of scientific illustration in the age of artificial intelligence”. Of course, that sparked my attention.
27 August 2026
Review: Info We Trust
Info We Trust is an ambitious, visually stunning book that sits somewhere between philosophy, information design, and a collection of visual essays.
28 January 2026
Gridlines are better than axes
Almost always, gridlines are better than axes. Vertical axes are the default option, and they have been around for centuries, so they are very well known. But they also have downsides. My biggest problem with vertical axes is that they’re often so far away from where the action is really happening.
24 September 2025
Review: A History of Data Visualization and Graphic Communication
Michael Friendly and Howard Wainer clearly love graphs. But A History of Data Visualization and Graphic Communication isn’t just about graphs — it’s about the stories behind them: the context, the people, the new measurements that made them necessary, and the discoveries they enabled.
18 September 2025
Report visuals don’t have to suck
Discover how CREG, Belgium’s electricity regulator, turns complex data into clear and engaging visuals. From smart annotations to small multiples and uncommon chart types, their Monitoring Report shows how thoughtful data visualization makes technical reports easier to read and understand.
1 September 2025
We are really into visual communication!
Every now and then we send out a newsletter with latest work, handpicked inspirational infographics, must-read blog posts, upcoming dates for workshops and presentations, and links to useful tools and tips. Leave your email address here and we’ll add you to our mailing list of awesome people!






