Side-by-side comparison of two bar chart versions showing the number of inhabitants per paid political mandate across EU27 countries, ranked from lowest to highest. The left version labels countries with two-letter abbreviations (FR, CZ, SI, etc.), while the right version uses full country names (France, Czechia, Slovenia, etc.). Both show identical data: France has the lowest ratio at 134 inhabitants per mandate, rising through the EU27 average of 385 (highlighted in dark blue), up to Latvia with the highest ratio at 2,570. Source: European Committee of the Regions and VRT NWS.

Avoiding abbreviations

Avoiding abbreviations

People are lazy. Make it as easy as possible for them to see what you are trying to show. “Mental noise” is my name for ‘work’ your audience has to do before they can actually see what they want to see. In a graph, it can be taking out a ruler to measure a distance, but also tilting the page to read non-horizontal text, or having to look up jargon.

There are tons of ways to reduce mental noise in your charts, but one of the easiest is avoiding abbreviations. Of course, space constraints, general usage, and the specific nature of the abbreviation don’t always make this possible (I wouldn’t replace DNA by deoxyribonucleic acid everywhere), but a specific case where I tend to avoid abbrevations at all costs are countries.

Yes, countries do have official abbreviations — standardized by the ISO 3166 guidelines. There are even 2-letter ánd 3-letter abbrevations for each country. For example, Belgium’s alpha-2 code is BE, and its alpha-3 code is BEL. In most official documents, such as reports by the European Union, the alpha-2 codes are most commonly used. Lack of space is often the main reason, in charts where 27 countries need to be shown.

Bar chart titled 'Number of inhabitants per paid political mandate,' ranking EU27 countries from lowest to highest ratio, labeled with ISO alpha-2 country codes (e.g., FR for France, DK for Denmark). France has the lowest ratio at 134 inhabitants per mandate; Latvia (LV) has the highest at 2,570. The EU27 average of 385, shown in dark blue, falls between Portugal (304) and Romania (415). Source: European Committee of the Regions and VRT NWS.

But these alpha-2 abbrevations are not always as straightforward as in the case of Belgium. Most people will recognize FR, NL or IT. If you know your languages, DE or ES will also make sense. And with some effort, we can decypher SK or AT, even though they don’t always make sense. Some of the lesser known ones are probably EE (Estonia – local name Eesti), HR (Croatia – local name Hrvatska) or EL (Greece – local name Elláda or Ελλάδα).

If you’re looking at 27 EU countries in a list of graph, that’s quite a lot of cognitive load to untangle and recall all of them. Your audience needs quite some background knowledge in order to fully understand your chart. Some people might not even bother looking up country codes they don’t recognize, which of course lowers the relevance of our entire graph. For this reason, I will almost always avoid country abbreviations, and write their names in full. That doesn’t even have to take up much more space:

The same bar chart as the previous visual, but now labeled with full country names to make the chart easier to read and process.

By avoiding these abbreviations, we ensure that readers don’t have to look up anything. They can stay engaged with the chart and get to the point much more quickly. And that’s of course what it’s all about.

Side-by-side comparison of two bar chart versions showing the number of inhabitants per paid political mandate across EU27 countries, ranked from lowest to highest. The left version labels countries with two-letter abbreviations (FR, CZ, SI, etc.), while the right version uses full country names (France, Czechia, Slovenia, etc.). Both show identical data: France has the lowest ratio at 134 inhabitants per mandate, rising through the EU27 average of 385 (highlighted in dark blue), up to Latvia with the highest ratio at 2,570. Source: European Committee of the Regions and VRT NWS.

Source: I encountered a version of this visual on VRT NWS, in an article on the number of political mandates per country (in Dutch). Most of their data was collected from a flash Eurobarometer report “Local politicians of the EU and the future of Europe” by the European Committee of the Regions.

Read more:

thumbnail for video 09 - choosing the right font for your data visual

Choosing the right font for your data visual

Fonts evoke emotions: there are very sophisticated fonts, playful fonts, attention-grabbing fonts, and elegant handwritten fonts. Using the wrong type of font can have a lot of impact. In data visualization the implications of typography are mainly focused on readability. Labels and annotations can easily become so small they get hard to read. Above all else, we should choose a font which is readable at small sizes.

Read More

thumbnail for video 08 - three roles of colour in a data visual

Three roles of colour in a data visual

Colour is one of the most crucial tools we have to turn a normal chart into a powerful chart with a clear message, a chart which tells a story rather than simply presenting the information.

Read More

thumbnail for video 07 - 7 different goals for your chart

7 different goals for your chart

A crucial step in building a powerful chart is choosing the right type of chart. A lot of charts don’t work because they simply use the wrong type of chart. To avoid this trap, we must ask ourselves a basic question: what’s the ultimate goal of our data visual? What do we want to show with our data?

Read More

thumbnail for video 06 - making a data visual noise-free

Making a data visual noise-free

Removing noise from a data visual is not only about taking things away such as gridlines, axes or legends. That’s just one part of it, which we could call removing physical noise. Improving the signal-to-noise ratio is often also about adding little things that help our audience better understand the visual. We are helping them by removing mental noise, or mental barriers.

Read More

Three tips to create powerful charts in Excel

Creating charts in Excel can be a very powerful tool for making sense of complex data sets, and for visualizing them. But the default options are not always the most pretty or effective ones. Here are our top three tips to create better Excel charts.

Read More

thumbnail for video 05 - a powerful chart has a high signal-to-noise ratio

A powerful chart has a high signal-to-noise ratio

‘Less is more’. It’s a crucial principle in most of our communication, and in data visualization in particular. Because of my background as a physicist, I prefer to talk about the ‘signal-to-noise ratio’. The message - our signal - should be amplified as much as possible, giving it all of the attention. Everything that can distract from our message - the noise - should be removed.

Read More

We are really into visual communication!

Every now and then we send out a newsletter with latest work, handpicked inspirational infographics, must-read blog posts, upcoming dates for workshops and presentations, and links to useful tools and tips. Leave your email address here and we’ll add you to our mailing list of awesome people!